New Jersey’s betting scene may be headed for a change, and it is not just about taxes or partnerships. A new proposal is now targeting how quickly people can place bets during games. If you have ever placed a small bet on what might happen in the next play of a football game or the next pitch in baseball, you have already run into what lawmakers are calling microbetting.
Good to know
Democratic Assemblyman Dan Hutchison is leading the push to stop microbetting in New Jersey. He recently introduced Bill A5971, which would prevent sportsbooks from offering bets that focus on the immediate outcome of the next action in a game. Hutchison believes this fast-paced betting style encourages people to make one decision after another without time to think it through.
In his words, “The pace of micro betting is designed to keep people gambling constantly, making one impulsive bet after another with little time to think.” He wants to slow that down and help reduce the risks that come with it—especially for people who might already be struggling with gambling habits.
Under the proposal, sportsbooks caught accepting microbets could face disorderly person charges and fines between $500 and $1,000 for each violation.
The timing of this bill follows a wave of changes in New Jersey’s gambling laws. Lawmakers recently raised the tax rate for online betting platforms to 19.75%. They also passed a ban on sweepstakes casinos, restricted sports betting partnerships with colleges, and are now eyeing limits on prop bets involving college athletes.
One reason for concern is the idea that microbetting might make it easier to fix games. Hutchison mentioned that there have been “several reported cases” of athletes investigated for possibly altering their play to influence bets. He did not name specific examples, but news outlets have reported that Major League Baseball is looking into two pitches thrown by Cleveland Guardians pitcher Luis Ortiz.
Even MLB commissioner Rob Manfred has spoken out, saying some types of bets feel “particularly vulnerable.”
It is worth noting that microbetting has become more popular in recent years. Some sportsbooks see it as the future of sports wagering. DraftKings even bought microbetting platform Simplebet for around $80 million, betting big on real-time action.
Still, Hutchison insists his bill is not trying to shut down sports betting altogether. He said:
“This legislation isn’t about banning sports betting. It’s about setting boundaries to ensure it’s done responsibly.”
There is also a mental health side to this. According to Hutchison, calls to New Jersey’s problem gambling helpline have jumped 277% since sports betting became legal. Luis Del Orbe, head of the Council on Compulsive Gambling of New Jersey, said microbetting may increase the risk for certain groups, especially younger people and those already facing gambling problems.
In Del Orbe’s view, cutting out microbets could help reduce that risk. “By eliminating micro betting, this legislation would take an essential step toward protecting citizens from the harmful effects of reckless gambling practices,” he said.