350% or 5BTC + 150 Spins!
New players only. Exclusive Welcome Bonus of 350% + 150 Free Spins
The Illinois Gaming Board (IGB) has temporarily suspended some sports wagers in response to a formal request from the NFL. Eleven betting categories that the league deems “inherently objectionable” are listed in the request. Administrator Marcus Fruchter made the announcement on Thursday, highlighting the possible threats to the integrity of the sports betting sector in Illinois.
Fruchter articulated his concerns in a signed document, stating, “I have determined that any wagering of the manner identified in the attached request poses a significant likelihood of serious risk to the integrity of the Illinois sports wagering industry.” The board is scheduled to review this suspension during a meeting on December 12.
Until that meeting, both online and retail sports betting operators in Illinois are prohibited from offering bets that the NFL claims could compromise the fairness of the games. The ban specifically targets negative-outcome wagers which the league believes could be manipulated.
The NFL has outlined several betting markets they wish to eliminate. These include wagers that are completely determined by a single individual, such as the first play of a game, the first incomplete pass, or a player missing a field goal. Additionally, any bets related to roster decisions, personnel choices, and officiating assignments—which are made prior to games—are also on the NFL’s list for suspension.
Jonathan Nabavi, the NFL’s vice president for Public Policy and Government Affairs, reinforced the league’s position, stating, “Prohibiting these wagers altogether would complement NFL policies that require game participants, and other NFL personnel, to use their best efforts on the playing field and to protect NFL ‘inside information.’”
Other bets under temporary restriction include those linked to player injuries, misconduct, penalties, and replay outcomes. The NFL characterizes these types of wagers as “inherently derogatory, designed to be inflammatory, or otherwise based on subject matter against public policy.”
Nabavi noted that the NFL has successfully pushed for similar prohibitions in states like Arizona, Indiana, and Kentucky. He mentioned that some states proactively banned these risky wagers through legislation or regulatory frameworks.
“We look forward to working with the Board to ensure that the potentially harmful or objectionable bet types are not offered in the Illinois market,” Nabavi asserted. “There is no greater priority for the NFL than protecting the integrity of our games and the welfare of our players. Fans, players, coaches, and personnel deserve to know that we are doing everything possible to ensure no improper influences affect how our games are played.”