US banks just gained clearer guidance on how they can handle crypto transactions for customers without taking on direct exposure. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency released an interpretive letter that reshapes how financial institutions can support crypto access while keeping balance sheets clean.
Good to Know
The OCC confirmed that national banks may step in between buyers and sellers in a rapid buy-and-sell sequence, known as a riskless principal transaction. The key element is that the bank buys the crypto from one side and immediately passes it to the other, keeping no long-term inventory and taking on minimal risk. Bitcoin falls under the scope because it is viewed as a non security asset.
Banks must still run these operations with strong controls, monitor exposure, and prepare for issues such as settlement delays or counterparties failing to complete a trade. The OCC describes these crypto transactions as similar to the brokerage activity banks already perform with other financial instruments.
This new letter follows earlier guidance that allowed banks to offer crypto custody under regulated frameworks. Combined, these decisions create space for traditional financial institutions to offer services long dominated by unregulated crypto platforms.
The update also marks a clear break from rules in place during the Biden era, when the SEC required institutions to list custodial crypto on balance sheets. That rule made crypto custody far more costly for banks due to capital charges. The SEC dropped the requirement in January, giving banks more flexibility to explore compliant crypto services.
The new OCC guidance now confirms that banks can facilitate crypto trades without turning those assets into balance sheet items.
A bank buys a crypto asset from one party and immediately sells it to another without holding inventory or taking market risk.
No. It applies to crypto assets not treated as securities, such as Bitcoin.
They must follow OCC standards for safe operations and comply with relevant laws but do not need to hold the assets themselves.
Earlier SEC policy forced custodial assets onto balance sheets, creating higher capital costs. That requirement no longer applies.